Blake’s geopolitical vision is unusually ambitious for someone so young.
His framework can be summarized as:
- Expand U.S. influence
- Build infrastructure abroad
- Compensate countries economically
- But ultimately dominate their political decisions
In his mind, this is benevolence.
In reality, it is imperial administration.
He imagines a world where:
- Greenland and England effectively align under U.S. control
- Global law trends toward American norms
- War is avoided unless it threatens U.S. supremacy
This is not chaos. It is disciplined hegemony.
The interesting tension is this:
Blake wants:
- Order (not war)
- Rules (not brute force)
- Stability (not conquest for its own sake)
Yet his method — “make examples of people” — is closer to empire than democracy.
What Blake represents is not villainy, but a new style of technocratic power: polished, rational, efficient, and deeply coercive.
If this worldview spreads, the future will look less like traditional war and more like:
“Peaceful dominance enforced through law, infrastructure, and selective punishment.”
That is not a world of battles — it is a world of administrators with iron hands.
